Angry Letter to IPA re ABC

I want to let you know that you are JUST a right-wing think tank. You are not the ‘voice of Australia’. You must desist immediately in trying to twist the ABC to your narrow libertarian style which is not wanted by Australians.

The ABC is NOT leftist. AS a matter of fact, I was cranky with some of the presenters during the last run-up to the elections, for being more right-wing biased. Which only goes to prove that we are all human, and have leanings. It is NOT your place to try to influence the ABC or our Government. With this Government, you have unprecedented influence, but hopefully that will be eradicated.

Australians will not stand for interference of this kind, and as you may be aware, the tide is rising now, against such influences as your organisation promotes.

You denial of the scientific FACT of the dangerous warming of our Planet, is damaging to we the people of Australia and our environment, our flora and fauna, our bio-diversity, our oceans. You talk of wealth through fossil fuels, which shows your collective greed and ignorance.

The way of the future is through renewable energy, as fossil fuels have been irrevocably proven to be now a danger to our future. Your reliance on your greed is unforgivable.

You will NOT win. Be very assured of this. Your flawed scientific advice from such as Bob Carter, David Evans, Joanna Nova, (so-called) Lord Monkton etc., is indicative of your closed minds and your greed. I certainly hope that none of you have children or grandchildren, as you would be consigning them to a ‘very damaged Earth’ if you were successful.

In closing, again, get your hands off OUR ABC. We will FIGHT

Letter to Senator Bob Day and replies

Dear Whoever (on behalf of Senator Bob Day)

Thank you for your reply.  I note that you did not address the question asked regarding Senator Day’s science credentials.  As he has stated his position of being skeptical regarding the science of Climate Change, and as he holds a position of importance to this Country, I believe he is obliged to state his credentials and how he arrives at his conclusion, despite the best science minds in the World advising us of the urgency of addressing mitigation of our carbon and methane pollution.

Thank you and I would hope to be hearing from you on the above matter.

Rhona Eastment

2rhoeas3@westnet.com.au

On 31 Jul 2014, at 2:21 pm, Day, Bob (Senator) <Senator.Day@aph.gov.au> wrote:

Thank you for your email, and apologies for the late response.  Senator Day appreciates the time you have taken to express your view.

Family First supports the repeal of the carbon tax.  At the last election, the Australian people voted overwhelmingly in support of abolishing the tax.  Family First will support an Emissions Trading Scheme if and when its major trading partners do the same.

Senator Day appreciates that you have written to him about a current issue that concerns you.  The Senator has been elected as a Family First Senator for South Australia on a platform of “Every Family, a Job and a House”.  This is a massive task.  Senator Day therefore has a limited capacity to advocate for (a) issues outside of his State or (b) policy priorities beyond that focus.  Having said that, Senator Day has indicated above what he has to say about the issues that you have raised.

Kind regards,

On behalf of:

Senator Bob Day AO 

Senator for South Australia

Commonwealth Parliamentary Offices                                           

Level 13, 100 King William Street, Adelaide SA 5000

Tel 08 8205 1080  Fax 08 8205 1085

S1.94 Parliament House, Canberra ACT 2600

Tel 02 6277 3373  Fax 02 6277 5951

—–Original Message—–

From: Rhona Eastment [mailto:blogrho44@gmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, 10 July 2014 3:15 PM

To: Day, Bob (Senator)

Cc: Hunt, Greg (MP)

Subject: RESPONSIBILITY – Carbon Pricing

Dear Senator Day

You have been elected to represent Australians and to make decisions on bills in the Senate, that will affect all Australians. You spoke on ABC RN recently and indicated that you are a skeptic, or probably more accurately, a denier of the science of Global Warming.

In the interview you advised that you have a ‘science background’, so I would like to ask you now, just what is it that you studied, graduated in, received a doctorate in, or similar?

I need to know this, as you will be making a decision which will adversely or otherwise affect both the population of Australia and myself, from now on. You see, I find it hard to accept that you are going to be making these decisions that will affect me, considering your stance on climate change. I want you to tell me what makes you think that you have the right to vote on your prejudiced opinion in your present position, rather than an intelligently informed decision from the experts in this field. I want you to tell me why you think you are better informed and researched than the, at least, 97% of CLIMATE scientists the World-over.

You say that the Carbon PRICE is costing too much. Strange, as tax cuts were introduced by the Gillard government to compensate for the effects of the Carbon Price, charged only to the ‘big polluters’. Do you have any concept of the cost to Australia, with the increase in catastrophic weather events, which we are even now beginning to experience? Costs in human life, human property loss, and the HUGE COST of constantly replacing infrastructure destroyed in these weather events. The carbon price has been performing well. The rest of the World is now beginning to wake up and introduce either carbon taxes or Emission Trading Schemes. Look up the ABC Fact Check.

My future, the future of my family and friends, and overall, the future of all Australians basically depends on people like you, in your position. With all the evidence-based knowledge now, the years of in-depth research and analysis and whatever else, performed by these multitudes of Climate Scientists, with the extremely worrying changes happening in the Arctic and in the Antarctic, in the oceans just to name a few significant areas, there can be no doubt as to the changing climate and its devastating effects.

The agencies created to expedite accurate information regarding the changing climate and methods to help mitigate the causes must not be repealed. The Carbon Price must only be repealed if an effective Emissions Trading Scheme is to replace it, if we are to make any impression at all in staving off much of the catastrophes associated with the accelerating Global Warming.

Therefore, it is of vital importance that you understand your position. You do not have the right to impose your personal opinions on the rest of Australia. Your job is to research accurately, and without your pre-formed bias, and then to vote for the best outcome for ‘we the people of Australia’. I hold you to this.

Rhona Eastment